Skip to Main Content

Types of Research Reviews: Identifying Reputable Journals

Identifying Reputable Journals

What is a Predatory Journal?

It is challenging to definitively identify a journal as "predatory," although there are common characteristics of predatory/deceptive publishers such as:

  • Peer review may be poor or non-existent.
  • Editorial board membership information may be incorrect. Individuals may be listed there without their knowledge or consent.
  • Information about publishing costs or article processing charges may be misleading.
  • Journals might not be indexed in scholarly literature databases such as PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, or CINAHL. However, a journal's inclusion in a database like PubMed does not preclude it from being predatory.
  • Websites might refer to non-standard impact factors or misrepresent where articles are indexed.
  • Content might not be digitally preserved.

Aside from doing a Google search for the journal's name and the word predatory, use the Think. Check. Submit checklist to evaluate a journal.

Journal Finders

Journal Finders

Edanz: Cross-disciplinary subjects

Elsevier Journal Finder: Medical, Health Sciences, Social Sciences

Springer Nature Journal Finder: Multidisciplinary Sciences, Medicine, Economics

Wiley Journal Finder: Chemistry, Life Sciences, Health Sciences

Taylor & Francis Journal Suggester: Humanities, Social Sciences, Environmental

MDPI Journal Finder: Open Access publisher

DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals journal finder: Search and filter by discipline, no publication fees, or retention of author rights.

JANE (Journal/Author Name Estimator): Journal ranking estimator based on the terms you provide on your topic.