Scoping Reviews explore the breadth of evidence on a research topic, synthesizes knowledge on a research question, and outlines emerging literature in a field. It involves mapping concepts, gathering the types of evidence on a subject, and discovering gaps in research. A scoping review is often conducted to determine if a systematic review is viable and will provide insights into the kinds of evidence that are available in a field and how research has been conducted on a topic.
2005 article outlining the methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews. Citation: Arksey, H. and O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 1, 19-32.
2018 article that clearly describes the differences between scoping reviews and systematic reviews and to provide guidance for when a scoping review is (and is not) appropriate.
A 2016 scoping review to identify papers that utilized and/or described scoping review methods and guidelines for reporting.
scoping reviews; and studies that assessed the quality of reporting of scoping reviews
Description of the checklist for the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews that was published in 2018. The checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items to include when completing a scoping review. Scoping reviews serve to synthesize evidence and assess the scope of literature on a topic. Among other objectives, scoping reviews help determine whether a systematic review of the literature is warranted.
Checklist for the 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items to include when completing a scoping review.